I did not provide the source because I want you to focus on the format and the sample marking scheme for a comparison question. It is slightly different from a single source inference question and requires much more analysis from you.
Question is on Problem in Post-War Singapore
Question: How similar are the Sources C and D in showing the conditions of post-war Singapore?
Comparison question Marking Scheme with some sample answering format
Level of Response | Level Descriptor and Rubrics | Marks Allocation |
L1 | YES(Inference without support from source content of C and D) 1 mark for answer without elaboration E.g. Yes, Sources C and D are very similar in showing that Singaporeans faced a lot of hardships during the post-war period.Award 2 marks for answer with elaboration E.g. Yes, both Sources C and D are very similar in that it showed that Singaporeans faced a lot of hardships during the post-war period. Many struggled to eke out a living as even the basic amenities such as food, water and shelter was hard to come by. |
1 – 2 m |
L2 | YES, supported from source content of C and D Award 3 marks for 1 piece of evidence from either Source C OR D Award 4 marks for 1 piece of evidence from Source C AND D Award 5 marks for 2 pieces of evidence from Source C AND D E.g. Yes, Source C says that the individual tried “……….” Source C also says that during the post war period “………”This is similar to Source D which says that the “……….” The Source also says that the some locals had to “………..” |
3 – 5 m |
L3 | Yes and No (critical analysis with support from source content for both sides) Award 6 marks for critical analysis for similarity E.g. After inserting the relevant evidence, you need to critically analyse and elaborate on the similarityE.g: Both sources show that Singaporeans were worried for their safety and survival in post-war Singapore. Both sources shows that each day was a struggle as they eke out a meager living. Award 7 marks for critical analysis for similarity plus difference E.g: Source C and D are very similar but with one difference…..(After which, you must critically analyse and elaborate on this difference) For allocation of 8 marks – there are ample evidence/examples to be taken from both sources with a stronger grasp of contextual knowledge about the problems of post-war Singapore. E.g. Based on my contextual knowledge, post-war Singapore was not that good a time to live in. The British government did try to make the situation better however. As an example, to try and solve the food shortage problem, the British cleared the harbour so that ships transporting foodstuffs could enter the port. Docks were repaired and trade links were established. This led to a gradual increase in food supplies. The British also tried to solve the housing problem. Many houses were destroyed by the war and many were left homeless. The British introduced a law on rent control to stop landlords from raising the house rents and forcing tenants out. They also tried to build flats to overcome the housing shortage. |
6 – 8 m |
L4 | Critical analysis of both sources but with a recognition and explanation of toneBoth sources display a negative and pessimistic tone about the conditions of post war Singapore. Source D shows later on, however, a more positive and optimistic view about the conditions in Singapore as things began to get better. | 9 m |